On June 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado that restored the metering policy, allowing Customs and Border Protection to turn away asylum seekers when ports of entry are deemed overburdened. The decision overturned a lower court ruling and clarified that an alien standing in Mexico has not yet arrived in the United States for purposes of statutory asylum processing. The Court also limited judicial review of certain Temporary Protected Status terminations.
The ruling subordinates asylum rights to administrative convenience and exposes seekers to risks in Mexican border regions by narrowing the definition of arrival.
“Humanitarian protections and judicial oversight versus executive discretion”
Conservative
The decision restores practical border management tools and curbs activist lower-court interference with enforcement authority.
“Sovereignty and executive authority over immigration”
Libertarian
The ruling limits judicial expansion of statutory entitlements and treats immigration enforcement as a core sovereign function rather than an open-ended program.
“Statutory text and reduction of administrative litigation”
Devil's Advocate
All perspectives understate the policy's Obama-era origins and overlook unverified TPS claims while ignoring operational capacity realities and legislative gaps.
“Shared omissions across analyses on bipartisan history and data”