The Rapid Support Forces captured al-Fashir in north Darfur after a prolonged siege, with a UN Fact-Finding Mission reporting mass killings, abductions, gang rapes, and forced starvation by the group. Separate reports attribute multiple drone strikes in July 2026 to the RSF, resulting in at least 25 civilian deaths. The RSF has denied committing abuses during the civil war.
“Drone strikes on civilian vehicles kill at least 20 in Sudan, rights groups say”
Read at The Hindu →“RSF forces’ actions in Sudan amount to genocide, UN probe finds”
Read at The Globe and Mail →No right-leaning sources covered this
The RSF siege and capture of al-Fashir constitutes genocide through mass killing, sexual violence, and engineered starvation, echoing earlier Janjaweed tactics and requiring urgent international accountability mechanisms.
“Deliberate campaign against marginalized populations fueled by resource extraction and ethnic power struggles.”
RSF atrocities in al-Fashir expose the consequences of armed militias operating with impunity in failed states, highlighting the limits of multilateral institutions like the UN.
“Weak central authority invites barbarism and regional instability.”
The RSF campaign represents a textbook violation of the non-aggression principle through mass killings, gang rapes, and starvation that strip individuals of basic rights to life and autonomy.
“Paramilitary forces exploit the absence of rule of law to consolidate power through terror.”
All perspectives accept UN findings and RSF attribution of drone strikes at face value without noting limited access, competing SAF claims, or mutual atrocities by both factions.
“Shared blind spot on verification gaps, external patrons, and one-sided narrative focus.”
Ratings by MBFC