A New Delhi court acquitted Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh of sexual harassment and stalking charges on Monday. The ruling cited inconsistencies in witness statements from five female wrestlers who accused Singh of groping and demanding sexual favors. Vinesh Phogat has stated plans to challenge the acquittal.
“Indian court acquits ex-wrestling chief in sexual harassment case”
Read at Al Jazeera →No center sources covered this
No right-leaning sources covered this
The acquittal underscores how India's legal system often shields powerful men accused of sexual misconduct amid power imbalances.
“Structural inequities and evidentiary burdens on survivors”
The ruling reinforces that accusations must meet evidentiary standards rather than relying on public campaigns or political pressure.
“Due process and skepticism toward narrative-driven claims”
The outcome protects individual liberty by requiring the state to meet a high evidentiary bar before restricting freedom.
“Presumption of innocence over collective demands or protests”
All perspectives accept the court's inconsistencies finding without examining their origins, timeline mismatches, or institutional factors.
“Failure to scrutinize power dynamics in both directions or selective sourcing”
Ratings by MBFC