DOGE's website stated $110 billion in taxpayer savings. A GAO review found that 96 percent of reported savings from canceled grants could not be verified, roughly half the figures did not follow DOGE's stated methodology, and $27.4 billion in claimed savings were never executed.
“DOGE’s claim of $110B in savings was vastly inflated and riddled with errors: GAO”
Read at ABC News →No center sources covered this
No right-leaning sources covered this
The GAO findings show DOGE's savings claims as largely unverifiable, with billions listed as achieved despite no contract changes.
“Portrayal of public spending as waste to justify cuts affecting vulnerable populations”
Methodological flaws and non-responses to GAO reflect friction with entrenched federal bureaucracies resisting scrutiny.
“Core premise of waste in federal spending remains valid despite imprecise early reporting”
Unverifiable and unexecuted claims illustrate how efficiency initiatives produce opacity rather than concrete reductions in government spending.
“Erosion of credibility in efforts to shrink coercive federal taxation and programs”
All views accept GAO standards as definitive without examining whether the $110 billion figure was an audited total or a preliminary estimate.
“Overlooks practical difficulties of rapid contract actions and possible informal savings”
Ratings by MBFC
GAO Report Reviews Verification Issues in DOGE Reported Savings of $110 Billion You are here